|
By Bill O'Reilly for BillOReilly.com
Thursday, May 17, 2012
My late father was a man of strong opinion. He despised phonies, cowards and liars. He named names—sometimes in very close proximity to those being singled out. A veteran of World War II, he recognized a weasel when he saw one.
But my dad never denigrated rich people in general.
We lived in Levittown, New York, where everybody had pretty much the same—that is, not much. We ate tuna casserole, hot dogs, and Hamburger Helper. My parents never owned a new car.
Ten miles away, my dentist, a college classmate of my father's, lived in Garden City. Lovely place, filled with rich people. My father often drove us through there and never said a discouraging word about the fine lawns and shiny foreign cars. America was the land of opportunity and Garden City proved it.
But that was then.
Today, many Democrats believe the wealthy are bad to the bone. A new Gallup poll asked, "Do you think the U.S. benefits from having a class of rich people or not?"
An amazing 46% of self-described Democrats answered "not."
When I asked two left-leaning pundits about this, they said it is all about "income inequality." They asked me if my father would approve of that. I said he would most likely reject the entire concept of "income inequality" by giving the pundits the same advice he gave me: "If you don't like what they're paying you, work someplace else."
And I followed that advice, moving ten times in 15 years on my way up the television news ladder. It wasn't easy, but if I thought my employer was hosing me, I began looking around.
That's how capitalism is supposed to work. America is mandated to provide "equal opportunity," not equal outcomes. The boss man can pay what he wants. It's our choice whether to take it or leave it.
President Obama doesn't seem to get that. He often puts forth that wealthy Americans are not paying their "fair share," that somehow the fix is in and the rich folk are gaming the system at the expense of working people. But for two years, Mr. Obama had an adoring Democratic Congress which did absolutely nothing to further the concept of "income equality." The reason: it's unconstitutional. The feds cannot dictate salaries and benefits in the private marketplace. Obamacare is an attempt to breach that Constitutional wall. We'll soon see what the Supreme Court says.
Capitalism is no beach day. The strong and sometimes ruthless prosper. The ill-educated and unfocused often fail. For many Americans, failure is unfair and unacceptable in a "just" society. But my dad knew and accepted the truth of capitalism: some will win big, some will lose big, but most will live comfortable lives in the middle. Just as he did.
##
|
Well, it sounds to me like the potus` class war fare is working and by election time he`ll have a great number of folks whipped up on this issue along with OCCUPY! HE SHOULD BE IMPEACHED FOR THIS BEHAVIOR!!!1
|
| Posted on May 21, 2012 at 10:45 PM by Jon S. |
|
|
I'm not sure what the purpose of the question is or if I care what the disribution of the answers are either. In the secular world we are struggling through, people forget that "Thou Shall Not Covert Thy Neighbors Goods" means, do not be envious or jealous of what other people have (or acquired or figured out how to hang on to). Wealth comes in many forms and preserving affluence is sometimes more complex than any of these pundits realize. The problem has never been how much money the government takes but rather what it does with it ... and there in lies the problem. As more and more people become dependent on government pay-outs, the more difficult it will become to fix the problem. The more the government borrows money to more difficult it is for money to be lent to private concerns to fuel innovation and employment.
|
| Posted on May 21, 2012 at 10:06 PM by Philip L. |
|
|
History proves there is no income equality. There were rich people and poor people in the Bible. They had widowed,orphaned, and invalids. Utopia does not exist in our sinful world. I am a middle class citizen and I am very content. However, I get very tired of hearing about the "class war" and the "race discrimination" as excuses for bad behavior. Totally agree!
I also agree! totally!
|
| Posted on May 21, 2012 at 8:13 AM by Julia t. |
|
|
Too bad the Left doesn't understand this.
Judging by the posts crying about the rich being too rich, I'd say that the only difference between those posts and "the left" is a matter of degree. Either you're jealous of the rich, or you're not. No middle ground.
|
| Posted on May 21, 2012 at 7:20 AM by Solidarnosc |
|
|
I will admit that I do a good share of hating on rich people. Maybe hate is too strong of a word, but I get some very negative feelings when I see them on TV and their dogs' wardrobes are more expensive than mine. And when the Facebook co-founder renounces his citizenship because heaven forbid he be a few million dollars poorer. Why should anyone be a billionaire? No one needs that much money. They can live quite comfortably on a few million bucks if they gave most of their money to charity. That being said, I'm not for Uncle Sam overtaxing them because it won't be just the rich taking the hit, but all of us. Too bad the Left doesn't understand this.
|
| Posted on May 21, 2012 at 7:07 AM by Connie R. |
|
|
|
|
|